MyNation Foundation Forum » Advice » Domestic Violence

domestic voilence case again mother and sister

(5 posts)
  • Started 5 years ago by ravikant
  • Latest reply from Dr.Dsouza
  1. ravikant
    Member

    Hi,

    My wife file DV case against male member of my family in July 2010. The case is still going on. Now she want to add my mother and sister name also. They are saying that they have their name earlier also. But as DV can not be file against women court has removed their name. But after the Supreme court decision of SANDHYA MANOJ WANKHADE Vs Manoj. Dv can be filled against women also. Can you please suggest me how I can fight with this now.

    http://www.stpl-india.in/SCJFiles/2011_STPL%28Web%29_116_SC.pdf

    Thanks,
    Ravikant

    Posted 5 years ago #
  2. ravikant
    Member

    Hi,

    Can some one please provide me the following decision

    2007(2) ALT (Crl.) 504(A.P) delivered by the Hon'ble High Court of
    Andhra Pradesh where in it was held "as there is no claim made against
    the other respondents, continuing process against them is a clear
    abuse of law".

    Thanks,
    Ravikant

    Posted 5 years ago #
  3. Dr.Dsouza
    Member

    Can you give us party name.
    may its listed here http://mynation.net/docs/sitemap/

    Posted 5 years ago #
  4. ravikant
    Member

    Hi,

    Can anyone please reply to my query

    My wife file DV case against male member of my family in July 2010. The case is still going on. Now she want to add my mother and sister name also. They are saying that they have their name earlier also. But as DV can not be file against women court has removed their name. But after the Supreme court decision of SANDHYA MANOJ WANKHADE Vs Manoj. Dv can be filled against women also. Can you please suggest me how I can fight with this now.

    http://www.stpl-india.in/SCJFiles/2011_STPL%28Web%29_116_SC.pdf

    Thanks,
    Ravikant

    Posted 5 years ago #
  5. Dr.Dsouza
    Member

    just because one judgment is changed that not mean that all will follow, if she add counter with SC judgmnet where it says women is not respondent. let them decide who is right or wrong
    meanwhile you can counter with
    http://mynation.net/docs/204-2007/
    http://mynation.net/docs/184-2006/
    http://mynation.net/docs/196-2007/
    http://mynation.net/docs/4375-2009/
    http://mynation.net/docs/494-2009/

    Posted 5 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.